Predictably, the slots pay a computer-prescribed return: limited to’luck’of the draw in slot winning or losing cycles. So, bet accordingly! A word to the wise: take advantage of the perks, the advice, and find the fairly loose machines; otherwise, you are a sure loser.
We submit to numerous generic outcomes: not merely testing our luck on games of chance but another big gamble: the odds no less insurmountable than Casino gambling. Oddly, no pun intended, the comparison rests inside our choice of a beneficial, spiritual, safe place, or to even the denial of supernatural existence. Areadomino Here,’chance depends on whether we’re born Judaic, Christian, Islamic, or as a doubting Thomas. Yet, like playing the slots, we are able to evaluate our luck of the draw in this regard also. We have to discover the paying proposition.
Why compare religious ethos with a questionable ethic like gambling?
If it’s possible to accept the diversity in religious customs and their irresponsibility to established rules of engagement, it’s possible to wonder at the advantage or outcome in discipline assurances. An interest shrouded in mysterious symbols, numbers, parables, or other unspecific language is no easy topic to decipher, nevertheless the dilemma is not impossible to solve.
The slots are easy to find: first, we all know they are computers programmed to return a certain profit to the Casino; second, we all know they must have winning and losing cycles to encourage bettors and yet assure profit for the home; third, we all know some machines are set to pay an inferior return than others; fourth, every slot winning cycle is followed with a losing cycle. Learn to acknowledge the symptoms. Some players more often than not leave the Casino a winner. Allow yourself to quit a winner.
Back once again to one other chance so commonly abused:
First, any spiritual belief is strictly in the mind;
Second, Daniel clearly limits the monotheism experience to Ten Ages; if one does not know the chronological schedule, he then is at the mercy of much disillusionment and false belief;
Third, Ezekiel advises of a strict limit to benefit, to the likes of Noah, Daniel, and Job;
Fourth, between the statements of Jesus and Paul, a strict limit to time-frame was “available” in the Last Age, and was arriving at a detailed in A.D. 68.
Therefore, in view of these factual observations, thinkers must commit to a reevaluation of the monotheism incentive.
If, in view of these conclusions, one still really wants to gamble, have a ride on the slots, or chance a religion choice, upon what group of rules or inescapable facts will he select as a benefit in these greatly contested gambles? You can’t lose by investigating the syllogistic expressions available nowadays and resulting from fifteen years of arduous research.